|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/10/21 11:56
In article <4D7Hg.14173$E02.4407@newsb.telia.net>,
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:
> > > > Just one of Luigi's pages has twice as much info as most of the
> complete
> > > > web sites on the planet ...
> > >
> > >
> > > Perhaps, but is it treated as such?
> >
> > You mean, does anyone look at your page and think:
> >
> > "Ah.. this page of Luigi's has twice as much info as most of the
> > complete web sites on the planet and I will now treat it as I
> > would if I had the complete set of websites on the planet right
> > here before me to browse. I will therefore now go get blind drunk
> > and fall into a sleep of the greatest stupor... "
>
>
> I mean that if you search "la Svezia" at www.google.it and choose
> the Italian language as option,
> you will find out that this page is not even among the first 10 results!
You mean is it treated as such by Google? And then you mean
further, that treating it as such by Google would mean it needs
to rank you among the first 10. You don't bother ever to explain
what you mean, folk are supposed to guess. And then, as if to add
a further layer of helpless nonsense, this could not at all be
true: specifically, it could not be true that if it did rank you
first, this would have the slightest relation to your website
being as big as all the websites in the world together. Let me
tell you what Google would really do, it it was tasked to give
your website a prize for being as contentful as the sum of all
other websites not including your own. It would do what I would
do faced with a similar task. I would go and get blind
drunk...and throughout the session I would set about my head with
a heavy piece of timber. In fact, that is not a bad idea
anyway... excuse me a mo...
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|