|
|
Posted by Brian Dunning on 06/09/05 20:07
On Jun 9, 2005, at 9:44 AM, Jochem Maas wrote:
> or (c) just placing the code inside the loop - no function call ,
> no include,
> just wash and go ;-) - whichever is faster of (a) and (b), my (c)
> will be faster still. :-)
I agree (c) would be swell but this is a function that I call from
many different places and that would make it too hard to manage.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|