|
|
Posted by dorayme on 08/29/06 21:28
In article <SyQIg.84$M%5.72@reader1.news.jippii.net>,
"Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> wrote:
> dorayme <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> scripsit:
>
> > Sometimes, more often these days, I have been using like
> >
> > div.1, div.2, div.3 {color: red}
> >
> > instead of
> >
> > div.1 {color: red}
> > div.2 {color: red}
> > div.3 {color: red}
>
> Well, it's surely bad design: using pure red color (hurts eyes), setting
> color without setting background,
You are definitely one of a kind..... able to speak with
authority because of your reputation even when making a totally
irrelevant remark. I am incredibly jealous of you and I am
wanting to come back in the next life as you for a brief period
to feel what it is like.
> You probably object by saying that it's just an example. But why write bad
> examples?
Of course, you have more class in your irrelevencies than the
average mushy brain who seizes on such things. You think ahead.
You go deeper. You defend irrelevancies by reference to higher
things, the dangerous effect of the writings of alt.church.html
>
> > I get the impression it gives trouble in some browsers
>
> I wouldn't bother caring about the issue without _hard_ evidence, and
> perhaps not even then. Any browser that gets such a simple thing wrong will
> probably fail miserably with CSS in general, so I'd ask the same question as
> about oldest "CSS-supporting" versions of IE: how do I prevent it from
> seeing my IE at all? (If I cared at all. I don't care about IE 3 users any
> more, for example; if they exist and they haven't disabled the browser's CSS
> features, they suffer from www browsing so much these days that they must be
> masochists.)
>
You just have not got it in you to say: "I don't know any modern
browser that gets this wrong". And be just a paI! But don't
worry, I think I am still falling helplessly in love with you.
> > I am especially interested in anyone who knows that comma
> > delimited pseudos are not a good idea (for reasons to do with
> > straight out not working as intended), eg.
> >
> > a, a:visited, a:hover: a:active {border:none}
>
> Well, there you have probably accidentally typed a colon instead of a comma
> after "a:hover", so you won't get the desired effect.
Yes, um... you are right of course, it was only a typo in the
post. Damn! Must be more careful. Actually I am sorry about this!
And now I feel more humble. God damn it. I don't like humble. It
does not agree with me. Ever lost a game of chess at the end by a
simple mistake?
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|