|
Posted by Ed Murphy on 08/30/06 04:58
rhaazy wrote:
> In reference to the version of SQL question, the reason I didn't
> respond is because I merely wanted what you clearly re-stated for me in
> your last post... -_-'
That sort of information often affects the answer (even if it happened
not to do so in this particular case). Giving the info and having it
turn out to be irrelevant is much better than omitting it and having
it turn out to be relevant.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|