|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/02/06 21:55
In article
<1157210396.191223.224220@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>,
"jokla" <djjokla@gmail.com> wrote:
> Jonathan N. Little wrote:
> > jokla wrote:
> >
> > > BTW, you guys convinced me to go back to tables . . . even if I don't
> > > like to do that
> > >
> >
> > You misunderstand, it is *not* that tables are not longer valid it is
> > that they should not be used to layout your page, i.e., "to place your
> > nav links here and your logo over there..." But what you have here is a
> > table, 3 columns of data which I can guess is 'part number',
> > 'description', and 'price'. Now if you were using a table to build your
> > *list* of links on your navbar or to divide up your page as top banner,
> > navbar and content, that would be an abuse of tables as layout!
>
>
> I'm aware of this . . . I just find tables unhandy and not very style
> friendly . . .
Huh! You mean the very opposite surely. You remind me here of the
Premier of Queensland who simply disarms every reporter's
criticism by jumping to their side and attacking his own
policies. No reporter on earth knows how to counter this and he
wins every time. They go off with their tails between their legs,
he smiles to himself off camera, the idiot voters think, well, he
handled them, never mind the content and he gets re-elected. (hey
Mark, interested in a little wager on the upcoming election
there?). Queensland has always been a bit odd.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|