|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/27/47 11:57
In article
<1157413761.150988.137700@74g2000cwt.googlegroups.com>,
"cwdjrxyz" <spamtrap2@cwdjr.info> wrote:
> First, your html page will validate at w3c if you add character
> encoding, but that is not the problem.
My test page to show folks is a grab from another context, (which
had the encoding you probably mean, I failed to grab it). It
seems to be doing what I showed in the pic urls from your
information. I was not quite sure what you were conveying to me
beyond my own information, but thank you anyway.
As to tables, you hating them.... I have to use them as I have a
fair number of tabular data sets of info to cope with and have no
distaste for them. they are old friends and I welcome
opportunities to hang about with them. The one you see here is
not quite how I would do it these days with the pics - though the
text info would best be part of a table.
Anyway, as I am working on the original from which I grabbed the
puzzling table I think I did something when cleaning it up and it
is now showing up in Safari and Opera as in the others. There is
now only some oddness about the test case! I better not stop to
investigate for now...and get on with the work.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|