|
|
Posted by dorayme on 09/07/06 23:52
In article <7a356$4500a6c0$40cba7b0$15418@NAXS.COM>,
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
> > In article <bd103$45002a9e$40cba7cb$2169@NAXS.COM>,
> > "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote:
>
> >> I an not sure what you are fretting about
> >
> > Meant it as an invitation for people to say what they thought
> > about the best strategy for laying out thumbnails, floated divs
> > or list? But you noticed the pain in my dithering soul.
>
> Just toying with you...should have indicated that I wasn't really serious.
>
No need to have indicated. I was toying with you! Lets get it
right about who is Chief Toyer... :-)
> >> even more styling flexibility with no markup changes...
> >
> > Yes. I will go a non <br> way. Your idea seems good.
> >
> > So, what do you think about the choice between floated divs and
> > inline list for thumbnails regarding assessibilty? You will see
> > two rather different strategies at the url. I fret between them.
>
> Either way, but I think I'd go with DIVs. DIVs seem a little more
> flexible to style. The ULs sometime behave a little unpredictably in
> some browsers when you get too creative. So I'd use DIVs and keep my
> options open.
>
This was my feeling at first, I was worried about the list idea
for browsers I have yet to test. But I will likely be influenced
by you to go with the divs for a serious application (like on a
commercial site or any I am paid to make).
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|