|
|
Posted by bozzzza@lycos.co.uk on 09/11/06 13:47
Erland Sommarskog wrote:
> bozzzza@lycos.co.uk (bozzzza@lycos.co.uk) writes:
> Yes. That would mean that SQL Server would first get any 10 rows, and then
> sort the 10 rows on Code. That does not appear as a very useful operation
> to me....
>
Thanks,
We have a massive table, that is taking 2 minutes to return the data,
and causing Sql Server Timeouts. I am looking into ways I can speed it
up.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|