|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/19/63 11:58
In article <vfaPg.16852$E02.6647@newsb.telia.net>,
"Luigi Donatello Asero" <jaggillarfotboll@telia.com> wrote:
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au>
> > The most immediate cause of your problem is a super long unbroken
> > string in
> >
> > <td headers="t10">Scaiecat Spa
> > Gigi-Italien-lgenheter-i-Italien-f r-fritidsndam l-i-Valle
> > DAosta</td>
>
> Sorry for my poor English but what do you mean by "string" in this context?
>
> > Put a break or space in it and the table will likely behave
> > itself more to your liking.
A "string" is just "some text". It seemed obvious that something
was too big for the right column in one of the tables. When it
was broken with a space, it then fitted in my normal browser
window.
> > (I know you are not going to like this Luigi, but I would bet
> > money on the majority of people (not just on this newsgroup)
> > thinking this page looks better when you completely turn off all
> > your style sheets.)
>
>
> Perhaps. But all the users who use Firefox can see the page after turning
> off all my style sheets, cannot they? Or do you mean that I should not
> include any style sheet at all?
I am saying that your CSS is causing a lot of trouble style-wise.
It seems just so remarkably better when all are turned off. It is
a pity that you don't see it that way. Better that users use
their own CSS if they are not happy in this case.
The point of CSS is that you have to do better than no style
sheet at all and to have the closest to no styles until you can
get a little consensus that each small change from nothing to
something is a definite improvement?
Take this case of trouble (caused by the HTML imo) about table
being too big. Without the CSS, the problem is much reduced
because the poor thing has the whole width of the browser window
to behave badly, and this is less bad than if it has only part of
the window (as caused by the CSS).
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|