|
|
Posted by Stuart Miller on 09/20/06 17:36
"Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@centralva.net> wrote in message
news:10eb5$451147a6$40cba77f$6512@NAXS.COM...
> Steven Saunderson wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 04:58:55 GMT, "Stuart Miller"
>> <stuart_miller@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>
>>> If I specify, for example, a 1600x1200 picture into a cell size of
>>> 160x120, when does the compression take place? Does apache compress the
>>> image before sending, or does the viewer's browser do the compression?
>>> Or can this be controlled?
>>
>> The resizing is done by the browser. It is much better to supply a
>> correctly sized image. If resampling is a bother I have a Win32 program
>> that will resample and upload images. Check
>> <http://stevensaunderson.com/pickup.htm> if interested.
>
> Since the OP was sent on OE, we can assume he has access to a WinBox. I
> would recommend the freeware IrfanViewer
>
> http://www.irfanview.com/
>
> Really simple to run batch mode where you can resize and apply filter like
> sharpen and even append to the filename if you wish to build all your
> thumbnail in one click. You can select all the file with drag and drop so
> it is ease for the technically challenged.
>
> --
> Take care,
>
> Jonathan
> -------------------
> LITTLE WORKS STUDIO
> http://www.LittleWorksStudio.com
Thanks for the information.
I post from an xp box because I have it keep it running for the business.
I have a file server running linux, and I have my own web server running
linux/apache here as well.
The large images are so that family & friends can edit and print the images
for themselves. I just post them exactly as they come from the camera.
The workload to the server of resizing images on the fly is not going to be
significant, so one day I will figure out how to do that. But for now, I
will continue to manually create the thumbnail size.
Stuart
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|