|
|
Posted by Luigi Donatello Asero on 09/22/06 11:20
"cwdjrxyz" <spamtrap2@cwdjr.info> skrev i meddelandet
news:1158890889.649172.279750@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Luigi Donatello Asero wrote:
>
> > So, how does it look like? Bad in all of them or good in all of them?
> > They look different on Windows 98 but on another PC where I use Windows
XP
> > they look quite the same at IE and Firefox.
>
> I am using Windows XP with all upgrades. Browsers used were Firefox
> 1.5.0.7, IE6, Netscape 8.1, Mozilla 1.7.13, Opera 9.01, Netscape 4.8,
> Amaya 8.1b, and a WebTV viewer program. Because your image is on a
> secure page the Amaya browser and WebTV viewer will not display the
> image at all. When all of these browsers are in their default settings
> as delivered, you view the image at full pixel size, and it appears
> exactly the same to me. All have a white background in the default
> settings. However in opera you can use f11 to switch between a white
> and full-screen black background. You can also select a small image on
> Opera. I do not recall any changes in image quality over many upgrades
> of most of the mentioned browsers.
>
> How images look is a subjective decision. It depends on the quality of
> the photo, the resolution used for the digital image, etc. This can be
> very subjective. Unless one has an expert Hollywood makeup artist, a
> close up photo of a woman often looks better to many if the photo is
> made slightly out of focus. This hides pores, hairs, and tiny skin
> blemishes. Thus higher resolution does not always mean "better" on a
> subjective basis. Also, many computer monitors and TVs have never been
> carefully adjusted for accurate color rendition, contrast, brightness,
> etc. Before one starts discussing how images view on two different
> computers or TV sets, on should be certain that both have been
> calibrated, or the discussion has little meaning. The best way to do
> this is to use a calibration DVD designed for adjusting home theatre.
> However I have a page that will let you see if the most important
> monitor adjustments are far off. It is at
> http://www.cwdjr.net/tool/a_color_bars.html . Of course, on an absolute
> basis, the images used on most web pages are quite poor because of the
> low pixel count used to avoid slow downloads. A good digital photo
> these days will be at least 2M and even 10 M for the better cameras.
> Enlarge most web page images a bit, and and you will soon see what I
> mean.
> You mentioned Windows 98 as well as XP. I wonder if 98 has the same
> color depth as XP?
Perhaps they do not. But how does that explain why the colours are displayed
in a very different way on
IE, Opera and Firefox using the same OP on the same computer?
--
Luigi Donatello Asero
www.om-italien.eu
她是澳大利亚人
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|