You are here: Re: CSS vs. tables // fixed vs. variable « HTML « IT news, forums, messages
Re: CSS vs. tables // fixed vs. variable

Posted by ron on 09/25/06 20:20

Chris wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've already read several times that CSS should be used instead of tables to
> layout your pages. But why is that actually? And why is fixed width layout
> so bad?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris

Chris here are my 2 cents:

Html by itself is left up to the browser to format/display to the user.
Web designers were finding it difficult to display information with
their own creative look and feel.

Then someone tried using tables for something they were not designed
for, and in a round-about-way it worked.

If you have a small site this may not be a problem, but if you have a
large site it becomes a virtual mess to update and/or fix. If you have
a very complex site, you will have tables nested with tables nested
within even more tables. It becomes insane.

CSS was not considered because at the time this was mostly suggested
for microsofts' IE browser, so to not discount anyone in the target
audience which had mozilla or netscape, most designer did not use CSS
for layout.

However today I can use CSS and it will work in Mozilla, Firefox,
etc... I can use CSS to create a layout with navigation bars and the
like, and for every new page I need, I just include the CSS.

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация