|
|
Posted by jojo on 11/27/94 11:59
peteraward@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Any ideas?
>>>
>> I think you've posted this far too much for anyone to want to bother
>> helping you any more.
>> <plonk>
>>
>> Here's a clue though:
>>
>> If you don't understand XHTML, just don't use it.
>>
>> If you don't understand why XHTML 1.1 isn't usable yet, then you don't
>> understand XHTML.
>
> Except that I have used XHTML 1.1 elsewhere
Which does not proof that you understand it but the opposite: You do not
know why XHTML 1.1 isn't usable yet...
> and been able to use CSS
> with it in the same way, same browser, and have it actually work.
Perhaps it worked... but in all browsers? and with the correct MIME-type
for *X*HTML?
> And I didn't see my message appear within 5 minutes, so I assumed that
> Google Groups had got an error in it's coding somewhere, given that it
> asked for my password every second page.
Use a newsreader instead of googlegroups... but just a hint... ;-)
And BTW: please do not "top post", make sure your reply is *below* the
quote! then you can read a post from the top to the bottom instead of
the way round, improves readability... Thank you.
> It doesn't work with XHTML 1.0 either.
Why don't you just use HTML?
> But it does work when no standard decleration is used.
Perhaps for some reason you need the quirks-mode? does your site
validate? (sorry, I had no time to check it myself..)
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|