|
Posted by Harlan Messinger on 10/06/06 19:49
Harlan Messinger wrote:
> As with any of the pseudo-elements, it's pseudo.
Er--pseudo-class, and first-child really *does* refer to an element from
which properties hang, despite what I wrote below.
> There isn't an element
> there that has properties of its own, display or otherwise. Only if a
> element specifier, to which a pseudo-element specifier is attached in a
> selector, matches an element in the document does the UA act *as if*
> there were an element possessing (only) the style properties that are
> set. This is what happens in the case of
> [...]
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|