|
|
Posted by techfiddle on 10/09/06 15:31
Thanks, Andy! Whether the topic is violin pedagogy (which I do
actually know something about), or Aikido, or gardening, or html, there
are always nice people, like you, that recognize the humanity in the
efforts of others, and then not-so-nice people, who make negative,
abusive remarks. In the case of the later, all that shows is their
lack of maturity, since they have a need to denigrate other people,
presumably, one supposes, to feel better about themselves. This is
always so obvious it's not worth commenting on.
Thanks again,
Connie
Andy Dingley wrote:
> Jukka K. Korpela wrote:
>
> > This also tells that your knowledge of HTML is far too limited to make you
> > competent to tell others what they should put into their HTML code.
>
> The OP isn't claiming to be an authority on HTML,
> they're claiming to be an authority on the violin webring.
>
> The fundamental guiding principles of the web are these:
>
> 2. Some technical stuff.
> 1. Easy access to publishing.
>
> Now your point is a good one as regards #2. The idea of some of the
> nearby posters updating their "web authoring guides" is indeed
> horrible. But what do we do about #1 ? Are _you_ ever going to have
> time to post joining instructions for the violin webring? Otherwise
> are you really advocating that the violin webring should be abandoned
> because there's no-one connected with it sufficiently skilled in HTML
> minutiae to describe it perfectly? The rainbow ruler GIF and animated
> under construction banners were some terrible old sites in technical
> terms, but I'd rather see them around than have an empty gap because
> there's no-one "sufficiently certified" and also with the interest in
> violins to build their pages.
>
> To the OP - your page isn't perfect, but even an imperfect page is
> always better than nothing. Stay tuned and maybe someone will continue
> to assist you getting it spot-on.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|