|
|
Posted by dorayme on 10/11/06 21:58
In article <m4OdnWRVb-XiJ7HYRVny2A@pipex.net>,
"Brian Cryer" <brian.cryer@127.0.0.1.ntlworld.com> wrote:
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:doraymeRidThis-BBFC72.08183911102006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au...
> > Anyone here using methods to make it more difficult for spammers
> > to garner email addresses from web pages. Mostly interested to
> > hear from anyone using specific methods (rather than anything
> > else like further reviews, analyses of the ultimate effectiveness
> > etc, having things like "removeThis" inside the email address
> > that is in the "mailto:").
> I'm sure you already know this, but: Whatever technique you decide to use
> (unless you go the route of a better spam filter) be sure to ditch the
> existing email address. Once you are on spammer's mailing list its unlikely
> that you will ever get off it. So there is no point deploying a
> "super-anti-spam" technique with an email address that already gets tons of
> spam.
I know what you mean. Looking on the bright side though, after a
while, without any response, without fresh harvesting, there
would start to be a reduction perhaps... after the point of
encoding provisions being made.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|