|
|
Posted by patrick j on 10/15/06 22:12
On Sun, 15 Oct 2006 22:45:42 +0100, dorayme wrote
(in article
<doraymeRidThis-361631.07454216102006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>):
> I mention this here to see if anyone can suggest a useful,
> reasonable workaday font that is least subject to this
> "bit-mapping" effect.
It is very true that the fonts are displayed surprisingly differently
in different monitors. The whole feel of them changes greatly.
I've been testing out different "preferred" fonts on my one web-site. I
had Arial for a few days but on some computers that looked very thin
and weak. Now I've got Trebuchet MS and I'm going to see how that
appears.
Because I work in an office environment 2.5 days in the week it is
quite a good opportunity to check out my web-site on different
monitors. They all have Windows but across the office is a variety of
screens. This is a very useful situation :)
--
Patrick
Brighton, UK
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|