|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 10/17/06 20:04
In alt.html, Mark Goodge wrote:
> Geoff Berrow put finger to keyboard and typed:
>
>> I have a site that won't validate at strict simply because the
>> client insisted on having target='_blank' on links.
>
> At the risk of asking a possibly dim question, why use strict if
> you're going to be using stuff that isn't in strict? Better to write
> valid transitional than invalid strict, surely?
(For new pages) I'd rather write valid Strict, then maybe toss in a
target "_blank" if the client absolutely insisted (and I could not make
hir understand) than to write Transitional. It is for updating existing
legacy pages where you don't have the time to remove all the old
presentational stuff.
I'll letcha get away with one error for a "_blank" <g>
--
-bts
-Motorcycles defy gravity; cars just suck
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|