|
|
Posted by Johnny on 10/17/06 20:06
"Jerry Stuckle" <jstucklex@attglobal.net> wrote in message
news:OIadnSwb9dbnL6nYnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@comcast.com...
> Johnny wrote:
> > "Tyrone Slothrop" <ts@paranoids.com> wrote in message
> > news:8hi8j2le321hqdkoouo2qnp9b8n11itnko@4ax.com...
> >
> >>On 16 Oct 2006 19:41:14 -0700, "Bryan" <BTRichardson@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Hello all,
> >>>
> >>>In some html code I have the following:
> >>>
> >>><script type='text/javascript' src='foo.js'></script>
> >>>
> >>>However, I'd like to replace 'foo.js' with something like
> >>>"bar.php?file=foo" and have bar.php echo foo.js back to the script
> >>>element. Is this possible?
> >>
> >>First, a query string will not work with an include, like:
> >><? include('bar.php?file=foo'); }
> >>
> >>However, you can create a function:
> >>
> >>function foo($file)
> >> {
> >> include ('$file.js');
> >> }
> >>
> >><?=foo('foo')?>
> >>
> >>Also review file_get_contents() and readfile().
> >
> >
> > imho that makes things way more complicated than they are...
> > the OP is refering to calling a PHP file from a script in an HTML file
not
> > from a PHP file.
> > a PHP file can be called from a script in HTML in the same way as you
can
> > post to a PHP file from a form using action="myscript.php" you just
refer to
> > the file.
> >
> > Also re clashers5: my understanding is that headers are not needed as
the
> > script is embedded as part of the http being sent to the browser with
header
> > started for that, it's being included just as foo.js would have been.
foo.js
> > would not have had a header included in the file.
> >
> > so you do something like these files (text as between and not
> > inlcuding the dashed lines):
> > -----------
> > <!-- file this.html -->
> > <html>
> > <head>
> > <title></title>
> > </head>
> > <body>
> > <script type='text/javascript' src='js3.php'></script>
> > </body>
> > </html>
> > ------------
> >
> >
> > and in file js3.php:
> > -----------
> > <?php
> > # this is file js3.php with some js to send back to the browser
> > # get the js from a db, file or wherever you like
> > $js = "alert(\"hi there!\");";
> >
> > echo $js;
> > ?>
> > ----------
> >
> > So all you have to do is either echo or print the js to get it into the
> > browser as it is embedded as part of the normal HTTP being transmitted
to
> > the
> > browser within the existing html header.
> >
> >
> > Here's what w3 has to say about scripts:
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/interact/scripts.html
> >
> >
>
> What a confusing way to do it - when Joe's method works quite well.
>
what a confusing and totally uncalled for response: when argument fails just
dismiss... oi!
what is so confusing about replacing 'foo.js' with 'script.php?foo' after
all it is that simple, the rest is illustration padding...
and BTW in case you didn't notice Joe and I are essentailly in agreement
except for the header part, which you don't argue with, just dismiss the
entire post. Anyone can dismiss. All I have done is expand on what Joe said
with an example but showing that it works just fine without the header.
And your contribution is...even more confusing but lacking any substance.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|