|
Posted by Mark Parnell on 06/17/05 05:17
Previously in alt.html, JohnWMpls <johnwfa@mn.rr.com> said:
> In O'Reilly - "HTML & XHTML The Definitive Guide", 5th edition.
Hmmm. They're generally pretty reliable (note: hearsay, never looked
myself).
> It is
> mentioned as deprecated in the descripiton for the span tag
*element*
> but not in the
> usual spot - the title for that tag's
*element's*
> section. I suspect an editing
> error.
You're sure it's not talking about a particular attribute or something?
It *is* definitely talking about the span element? Not trying to insult
your intelligence, but I don't understand how something like that could
have slipped past both the authors and editors.
> I also like <u>, the underline tag,
Hopefully you also like the </u> tag just as much. Or are you talking
about the u *element*? ;-)
> which is deprecated. The <u> is so
> much simpler than the css text-decoration for random uses on a page.
It doesn't carry any semantic meaning though (at least, not in any
context I'm aware of), unlike <b> and <i>, which can.
--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
alt.html FAQ :: http://html-faq.com/
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|