|
|
Posted by Steve on 10/19/06 22:35
".:[ ikciu ]:." <no@mail.com> wrote in message
news:eh8p7k$o1b$1@news.dialog.net.pl...
| Hmm Steve <no.one@example.com> wrote:
|
| > thanks breklin, i appreciate being described as spewing BS and that
| > you don't want to (ironically) follow the same path. i do agree that
| > i've endulged 'the other guy' long enough, however he dogs me in every
| > post...just got tired of it. this happened to be the unlucky thread.
|
|
| unlucky or not autoincrement and unique is your solution, as i wrote at
the
| begining but nobody wanted to trust me ....
|
| laalla lalall alllal lalllal im troll lallalalallllala
yes, you ARE trolling. i guess i need to reset my plonk screening in my
newsreader!!!
as for your comment, your solution:
1) call op stupid for asking
2) 'auto increment fixes all'
3) 'just make product code an INT'
4) 'oh, now you must also include auto increment AND a unique value in data'
(which WE told you!)
5) insult other solutions that DO take care of op question
6) dramatically alter your solution so it looks STRIKINGLY similar to TWO
others given here
7) NEVER give example of YOUR OWN source code
8) continue to troll
FOAD
no one 'trusts' you because YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE FUCKING TALKING
ABOUT.
<PLONK>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|