|
Posted by Matthew256 on 10/31/06 17:44
I've heard that Google looks at a 301 redirect as the same as a link
from the .cfm page to the .php page.
Is this correct?
Matthew
On Oct 30, 1:48 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
> Chung Leong wrote:
> > Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> >>Chung Leong wrote:
>
> >>>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
> >>>>But .cfm is a Cold Fusion template file. Why would you have php code in it?
>
> >>>>You'll be much better off in the long run if you change the extension to
> >>>>something standard like .php. Or just get yourself a virtual private
> >>>>server where you can do anything you want.
>
> >>>My guess is that the OP needs to preserve the URLs in existing links.
> >>>This is probably better handled through Apache rewrite than changing
> >>>the file extension of the source files.
>
> >>A 301 redirect takes care of things quite nicely - and permanently.
>
> >>--
> >>==================
> >>Remove the "x" from my email address
> >>Jerry Stuckle
> >>JDS Computer Training Corp.
> >>jstuck...@attglobal.net
> >>==================
>
> > One would use rewrite to do that, naturally.You can use a rewrite. But a redirect will allow the search engines to
> pick up the change without affecting current page rank. So eventually
> you can get rid of your redirects.
>
> If you just do a rewrite no one will know it's actually changed.
>
> --
> ==================
> Remove the "x" from my email address
> Jerry Stuckle
> JDS Computer Training Corp.
> jstuck...@attglobal.net
> ==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|