|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 10/31/06 21:15
Matthew256 wrote:
> I've heard that Google looks at a 301 redirect as the same as a link
> from the .cfm page to the .php page.
> Is this correct?
>
> Matthew
>
> On Oct 30, 1:48 pm, Jerry Stuckle <jstuck...@attglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>Chung Leong wrote:
>>
>>>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>>>>Chung Leong wrote:
>>
>>>>>Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>
>>>>>>But .cfm is a Cold Fusion template file. Why would you have php code in it?
>>
>>>>>>You'll be much better off in the long run if you change the extension to
>>>>>>something standard like .php. Or just get yourself a virtual private
>>>>>>server where you can do anything you want.
>>
>>>>>My guess is that the OP needs to preserve the URLs in existing links.
>>>>>This is probably better handled through Apache rewrite than changing
>>>>>the file extension of the source files.
>>
>>>>A 301 redirect takes care of things quite nicely - and permanently.
>>
>>>>--
>>>>==================
>>>>Remove the "x" from my email address
>>>>Jerry Stuckle
>>>>JDS Computer Training Corp.
>>>>jstuck...@attglobal.net
>>>>==================
>>
>>>One would use rewrite to do that, naturally.You can use a rewrite. But a redirect will allow the search engines to
>>
>>pick up the change without affecting current page rank. So eventually
>>you can get rid of your redirects.
>>
>>If you just do a rewrite no one will know it's actually changed.
>>
>>--
>>==================
>>Remove the "x" from my email address
>>Jerry Stuckle
>>JDS Computer Training Corp.
>>jstuck...@attglobal.net
>>==================
>
>
No. 301 is a permanent redirect. Google effectively replaces the page.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|