|
|
Posted by patrick j on 11/06/06 22:21
On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:47:15 +0000, dorayme wrote
(in article
<doraymeRidThis-41C559.08471507112006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>):
> I assume it does not muck up the simple top footer?
The top footer is fine :)
> Yes, I was most interested in that thread [1] and what old
> Bootnic said (I think it was Bootnic). Thanks for reminding me of
> this re list. I will put something in along the lines suggested
> by Bootnic. Hang on... why not right now...
I think for this you need to view it in IE7. I found I had to fiddle
with the padding a bit as well as put in the { zoom: 100%; }
declaration.
> ok, done, I left out the margin bit Bootnic put, not
> investigating the effect of this for now. Does this make the list
> re zoom in 7 behave?
Well I've just looked and it's not behaving :(
Here is a picture of it at 150%
<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk/doraymefooter.png>
> Something I cannot test as I have 2000 on my Winbox. But if IE7
> becomes quite popular, I suppose I will consider upgrading OS.
It is popular now :)
Windows XP downloads this as an automatic update and so the uptake is
hugely high.
The office I work in 2.5 days a week (yuk) is all full of people who
use PCs in the office and home and their PCs at home and work have
automatically updated to IE 7 now. For them IE 6 is a distant memory.
They're marvelling at the joys of tabbed browsing and are very grateful
to Microsoft for inventing it.
They are enjoying the zoom feature and once again are very grateful to
Microsoft for inventing that.
--
Patrick
Brighton, UK
<http://www.patrickjames.me.uk>
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|