|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/06/06 23:28
In article
<0001HW.C17565D80134F5D1B019F94F@News.Individual.Net>,
patrick j <patrick@jamesnews.orangehome.co.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Nov 2006 21:47:15 +0000, dorayme wrote
> (in article
> <doraymeRidThis-41C559.08471507112006@news-vip.optusnet.com.au>):
>
> > I assume it does not muck up the simple top footer?
>
> The top footer is fine :)
>
> > Yes, I was most interested in that thread [1] and what old
> > Bootnic said (I think it was Bootnic). Thanks for reminding me of
> > this re list. I will put something in along the lines suggested
> > by Bootnic. Hang on... why not right now...
>
> I think for this you need to view it in IE7. I found I had to fiddle
> with the padding a bit as well as put in the { zoom: 100%; }
> declaration.
>
> > ok, done, I left out the margin bit Bootnic put, not
> > investigating the effect of this for now. Does this make the list
> > re zoom in 7 behave?
>
> Well I've just looked and it's not behaving :(
>
> Here is a picture of it at 150%
>
> <http://www.patrickjames.me.uk/doraymefooter.png>
>
> > Something I cannot test as I have 2000 on my Winbox. But if IE7
> > becomes quite popular, I suppose I will consider upgrading OS.
>
> It is popular now :)
>
> Windows XP downloads this as an automatic update and so the uptake is
> hugely high.
>
> The office I work in 2.5 days a week (yuk) is all full of people who
> use PCs in the office and home and their PCs at home and work have
> automatically updated to IE 7 now. For them IE 6 is a distant memory.
>
> They're marvelling at the joys of tabbed browsing and are very grateful
> to Microsoft for inventing it.
>
> They are enjoying the zoom feature and once again are very grateful to
> Microsoft for inventing that.
In that case, the zoom thing becomes more important than I
thought. (I thought a lot of people are not on XP SP2?) Anyway,
what else can I do. Maybe Bootnic's margins are important! Better
have another fiddle. Thanks for going to the trouble of picturing
the 150%. Yes, no good eh...
It is all this mucking about that makes me wanna go back to the
simple original presentational mark up with and upright
slash. The truth is that there is no maintainence problem with my
footers to speak of (esp as they are to "included" via php). If i
keep having probs, I go back to original (and - see other post -
too bad for spacing prob in iCab)
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|