|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/10/06 20:46
In article
<1163179117.436387.190450@f16g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com> wrote:
>
> Travis Newbury wrote:
>
> > Andy Dingley wrote:
> > > > We are looking to update our website to a flash based layout,
> > >
> > > I'm having trouble associating "Flash" with "update". Don't you mean
> > > "Throw away all the content and replace it with pictures of dancing
> > > penguins, on a site you can no longer navigate quickly" ?
> >
> > Andy. If a company switched from a "everyone in the freeking world can
> > see it" website to a Flash website and their revenue increases. Is it
> > a good thing or a bad thing?
>
> Of course it's a good thing.
>
Not necessarily. But it is an argument!
> http://www.tidefordorganics.com
>
> Was this site really better in Flash?
>
Well, what was it like before?
(I liked the way you can turn the pages as with a finger... I did
not like not being able to enlarge the text - the zoom is
practically useless)
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|