|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/11/06 03:12
Andy Hassall wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:53:16 -0500, Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>Of course this is on IIS, so there's no .htaccess.
>>>
>>>There's not even a webserver ... SCNR
>>
>>Bullshit. It may not be as good as Apache, but it still is a perfectly
>>good webserver.
>
>
> On this point, agreed - IIS 6 is a reasonable basic webserver. I run one at
> work in a mixed ASP (legacy code) and PHP (new code) environment, and it's
> noticably better than IIS 5, and Apache on Windows is historically not
> brilliant. Having said that, I'm still working (slowly) towards Apache on a
> UNIX variant (probably RHEL), since all the new code is PHP and is gradually
> replacing the ASP.
>
>
>>Sorry, Micha. Your theoretical ideas don't work in practice.
>>
>>Try doing parsing every file (including static html files) for three or
>>four different languages.
>
>
> You've missed the point - I don't believe anyone has suggested that you do
> that.
>
Andy, that's exactly what Micha is suggesting. Remove the extension
from the file and have Apache parse all files the same way.
In fact, his first suggestion was to tell Apache to parse all .html
files with PHP, whether they included PHP code or not. Then I brought
up other conditions - like the site I mentioned which currently uses
asp, php and perl - and will soon probably be using python.
And I'm supposed to parse every page for each of these?
All to match his Utopian ideal of having URI's which are completely
independent of technical details.
Good in theory. But not in practice.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|