|
|
Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 11/14/06 03:04
Sanders Kaufman wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>
>> Sanders Kaufman wrote:
>
>
>>> It's worth pointing out that regular old HTML is deprecated. It's
>>> obsolete. It's tech from an eon gone by. XHTML is the new standard
>>> - more workable with XML, XSLT, and XForms.
>>
>>
>> Which will be very nice when the browsers learn how to get it right.
>> Hold it - they haven't even learned how to get plain old HTML right yet!
>
>
> You're right.
> There's no sense in learning any technology because all of them are
> imperfect.
>
> F******g troll.
> -PLONK-
Can't you take a joke, you jackass?
First of all, I never said there was no sense learning it. Don't put
words in my mouth.
Secondly, I never said that XHTML, etc. all were bad.
All I observed is that browsers still have a lot of trouble with XHTML,
et. al. And this isn't limited to any one browser - all of them have
troubles in one area or another.
But I also indicated that they haven't even gotten HTML right yet. So
according to your statement, there's no sense learning HTML either, is
there?
I stand by my statement. These technologies will be very nice when the
browsers learn to get it right. Until then they are a real PITA to get
to work properly in more than one browser. Sometimes it's hard to get
them to work in even one browser!
OTOH, like it or not, HTML will be around for a long, long time yet.
And maybe *eventually* browsers will get it right.
--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|