|
|
Posted by dorayme on 11/20/06 23:01
In article <4sejtcFvg06eU1@mid.individual.net>,
"J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> wrote:
> > Some sites I maintain have a lot of pages and changing the names
> > of all the files is the last thing I would do, not the first ;-)
>
> A small shell script fixes both file names and anchor urls, it's not that you
> must to rename files and fix links manually.
>
> http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/Bash-Prog-Intro-HOWTO.html#ss12.3
>
> and checking the man page for sed.
>
>
What does "fix" mean? Sorry, I am lost. I don't want to change
all the file names for a big site, each of which has a footer
involved. Not because I can't do it easily en masse (without
going to each file name and renaming) but because it does not
sound like a good idea to me to change all my files and all the
urls and all the links in everyone's bookmarks and then
instigating further things to cope with this.
> > No, what I want is everything. I want the source view to look
> > sort of formatted to the extent of not being in one unbroken
> > unreadable line, I want to include footers and nav and repeatable
> > elements, I want nothing to be unduly slowed down, I want all
> > this to be easier than winning the lottery.
>
> Your editor using newline or something else to make a "line break"?
You tell me? How do I tell? I posted this query because the exact
same files on the server that were view-sourced through a browser
before I fiddled about with an .htaccess file (see original post
of mine) changed their appearances when view-sourced afterwards.
Same server, same browsers, same editor, same files, .hta access
fiddling the only real difference.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|