|
|
Posted by Buddy on 11/30/06 13:58
Whoever asked that question probably didn't know the difference... so I
say LISP is better because whoever they are should probably start
there.
Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Marcin Dobrucki wrote:
> > gavino wrote:
> >
> >> can lisp be used for building websites that are large and complicated
> >> and in the end be good to maintain?
> >
> >
> > As surprising and radical a thinking as might be, there are other
> > purposes for programming languages than making dynamic webpages. Can
> > you drive down a highway in your in a speedboat? I think not.
>
> True, and PHP can be used for those things.
>
> His question was - "can lisp be used for building websites that are
> large and complicated and in the end be good to maintain?"
>
> If the answer is no, then it could be argued that PHP is better because
> it can do things lisp can't.
>
> However, the bottom line is - the original question is meaningless.
> It's like asking "is a submarine better than a minivan?" It is if
> you're studying the ocean floor.
>
> --
> ==================
> Remove the "x" from my email address
> Jerry Stuckle
> JDS Computer Training Corp.
> jstucklex@attglobal.net
> ==================
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|