You are here: Re: what is better strict or xhtml? « HTML « IT news, forums, messages
Re: what is better strict or xhtml?

Posted by Mark Parnell on 12/19/11 11:19

Previously in alt.html, windandwaves <winandwaves@coldmail.com> said:

> Because i thought a document could only be A or B, just the wrong
> assumption.

That depends what A and B are. XHTML vs HTML and Strict vs Transitional
are 2 completely separate issues.

> Are you saying you could have a strict and transitional
> document?

No, but an HTML document can be either Strict or Transitional. And an
XHTML document can be either Strict or Transitional[1].

> Yep, will stay with strict.

HTML, presumably. :-)

[1] OK, so only true for XHTML1.0, not 1.1. But since XHTML1.1 *must* be
served as XHTML, and IE doesn't understand XHTML, XHTML1.1 is simply not
practical on the WWW at the moment, and probably won't be for a number
of years yet.

--
Mark Parnell
http://www.clarkecomputers.com.au
alt.html FAQ :: http://html-faq.com/

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация