|
|
Posted by Beauregard T. Shagnasty on 12/02/06 15:57
natashab wrote:
> thank you for your total lack of support, in fact I find your replies
> totally demeaning to the fact that I have created a sight with no
> html knowledge, with no internet server, hosting etc experience what
> so ever. I gave something a shot that I had an interest in.
Since you chose my post for this reply, I feel compelled to answer, even
though the early-rising non-Americans have already addressed most of it.
> You all obviously have a far greater knowledge than myself but to put
> me down and my attempts, I find is disgusting in the first degree.
Sorry you don't like succinct replies. Hey, I could have spiced it up
with lots of smiley faces and attached some happy music, right?
> Yes it probably is well out of 1995. How else is one meant to learn
> without trial and error.
Your first step would be to dump this:
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" name=GENERATOR>
and use a good text editor, using the tutorial I suggested.
> The coding change I talked about has nothing what so ever to do with
> the frames and everything to do I believe with having sent the html
> index file to friends to look at and then them sending it back to me
> edited.
What?! Pardon me for not checking my crystal ball first! Where in your
original post did you state that you send your web site *files* to the
friends? The friends *edit* the files, and then you ask how they got
changed? <phew!>
You said: "because somewhere along the line of having a few friends
check on what I had created it now appears that the coding is entirely
different than my HTML I orginally wrote for it"
Perhaps your *friends* are the ones using "MSHTML 6.00.2900.2873" and
they should be reading the advice here about proper authoring?
> I joined this group thinking I would gain an understanding to the
> development on web design and learn more about coding.
And you will, if you keep your ire in check, and study (and act upon)
the responses you've gotten.
> The course I am on has again nothing to do with how I have coded the
> site as I haven't even advanced to that point of correctly learning
> HTML or even CSS!!!! So please do not be so down on my work or my
> choice of education.
I for one am curious as to what/where this "course" is located.
> Unlike most of you that are most likely far enough qualified in this
> field I am but a mere beginner, I didn't expect this kind of a
> slagging down.
Trust me; you weren't slagged.
> You rudeness in totally thread jacking my thread to discuss many other
> topics other than my introduction or to give me proper words of
> advice on how to correct my errors and put me on the right path
> totally astounds me!!!
"Welcome to Usenet."
> Now you may all be just as rude back but I feel I am just in sounding
> off in this manner because this wasn't the welcome I expected what so
> ever!!!!
"Welcome to Usenet."
> Or do none of you have proper manner and are really as crass as I
> have been led to believe about most Americans!!!!
More than half of the respondents in this thread are not Americans.
By the way, your computer appears to be infested with the malware known
as "FunWebProducts." Your header indicates it:
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
{FC139AA5-EB29-4C23-BF32-60A94FDAF0B1};
FunWebProducts),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Read this:
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=funwebproducts+spyware>
> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
<snip rest>
Please don't top-post.
--
-bts
-This message has been tested for polonium-210 and found to be safe
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|