|
|
Posted by Andy Dingley on 12/04/06 20:25
chronos3d wrote:
> I'm designing a site for a restaurant and want to insure it's code is
>I've read that new sites should be written in XHTML..
Wrong.
> I've coverted the site to XHTML 1.1.
Well convert it back to HTML 4.01 Strict, like you should have used in
the first place! Or at least convert it back to XHTML 1.0 Strict
Appendix C
> there's also an option for XHTML mobile 1.0.
"An option for" suggests that you're using some idiot-tool to make this
site (which you didn't tell us the URL for) rather than understanding
what you're doing.
> I'm
> interested in the mobile aspect since one never knows if someone with a
> wireless device will access the site.
That's the point these days - you'll never know. So don't assume and
don't serve mobile-specific formats unless you _know_ you're serving to
a mobile device (i.e. you're working with a mobile networks'
walled-garden servers)
If you're publishing to the public web, just do good-quality valid work
in HTML 4.01 Strict and let the network handle any transcoding needed.
Obviously this means a good fluid design too, not <table>s and pixels.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|