You are here: Re: Should I Convert Site To XHTML or XHTML mobile? « HTML « IT news, forums, messages
Re: Should I Convert Site To XHTML or XHTML mobile?

Posted by Andy Dingley on 12/05/06 16:46

kdarling@basit.com wrote:

> WAP 1.0 had transcoders, but XHTML-MP (Mobile Profile) is used in
> devices that connect directly to the internet.

This starts to get awfully network-dependent (still, although less than
it used to be) but the networks that support "free range" web access to
http://*.internet:80 in general still have some level of proxying or
transcoding in situ. For one thing, they'll resize images. They may
pass HTML-like content through if it looks acceptable, but for most of
it (how else are you going to browse the general web?) it'll transcode
from tag soup into XHTML-MP first

XHTML-MP is an important issue if you're dealing with networks or
handsets, but you don't need to code in it for a public site and it
will still get mobile access from many devices and networks.

 

Navigation:

[Reply to this message]


Удаленная работа для программистов  •  Как заработать на Google AdSense  •  England, UK  •  статьи на английском  •  PHP MySQL CMS Apache Oscommerce  •  Online Business Knowledge Base  •  DVD MP3 AVI MP4 players codecs conversion help
Home  •  Search  •  Site Map  •  Set as Homepage  •  Add to Favourites

Copyright © 2005-2006 Powered by Custom PHP Programming

Сайт изготовлен в Студии Валентина Петручека
изготовление и поддержка веб-сайтов, разработка программного обеспечения, поисковая оптимизация