|
|
Posted by Harlan Messinger on 12/07/06 17:21
JJ wrote:
[top-posting corrected]
> On Thu, 07 Dec 2006 16:24:03 GMT, Joel Shepherd
> <joelshep@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
>
>> In article <gmaen29rv2h832fkjm91k5k4aue9qbicj0@4ax.com>,
>> JJ <fake@fake.fake> wrote:
>>
>>> i didnt say FREE host.. i said FREE-SPEECH webhost..
>>>
>>> and why would a host want to fight for me and my right to free speech?
>>>
>>> well maybe to defend the first ammendment? if thats of any importance
>>> to you... Even if it is just 'MY' 1st ammendment thats being
>>> violated...
>> You're aware, of course, that the 1st Amendment applies to US citizens
>> and certain US residents only, correct?
>>
>> Seems like a relevant point, given that you seem to looking for an
>> "overseas host". If they're overseas, they're not going to give a damn
>> about your rights.
> you make a valid point. The reason i want an 'offshore' host is
> because i dont want my first ammendment rights to even be challenged.
That doesn't make any sense. The First Amendment is irrelevant
altogether in every country but the US. In many of those countries,
there isn't any protection of speech at all.
> As long as it is in another country (with favorable free speech laws)
> then it will be more difficult for any groups in the usa to do much
> about it.
So then a group in *that* country might do something about it. Do you
think that the US is the only country where people protest the activity
of others?
> Im not an expert on international law so im still
> researching it.. maybe japan? netherlands? Switz?
>
> and note to everyone reading these threads, i didnt start this to
> offend people but i admit when i see people getting flustered i do
> like to throw wood on the fire :) Peace
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|