|
|
Posted by Skijor on 12/14/06 04:03
Thanks all.
As far as the JavaScript definitions go, is there really a good reason
to generate the functions on the fly like this? I assume I can just
statically define them in a .js file instead of creating them on the
fly every time my php code is called. The assumption being I replace
the function definitions with function calls in the php-generated HTML.
bill wrote:
> Curtis wrote:
> > Here's the PHP manual's page on heredoc syntax:
> >
> > http://php.net/manual/en/language.types.string.php#language.types.string.syntax.heredoc
> >
> > On Dec 11, 7:19 am, bill <nob...@spamcop.net> wrote:
> >> see end of post:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Double Echo wrote:
> >>> This is old-style dirty PHP programming. There are a lot of stupid
> >>> programmers
> >>> who mingle/mangle code like this trying to be cute. Instead of some HTML
> >>> with PHP thrown in, reverse it. Have PHP with HTML thrown in. PHP
> >>> should be the control, HTML should not be.
> >>> <?php
> >>> $var = 1 + 1 ;
> >>> print <<<ENDOFHTML
> >>> <html>
> >>> <table>
> >>> <tr>
> >>> <td>
> >>> $var
> >>> </td>
> >>> </tr>
> >>> </table>
> >>> ENDOFHTML;
> >>> $some_more_php = 2 + 2 ;
> >>> print <<<ENDOFHTML
> >>> $some_more_php
> >>> ENDOFHMTL;
> >>> ?>
> >>> A lot of web servers won't be set up for HTML-with-PHP but if you have
> >>> a web server with PHP enabled, you can always throw in HTML. Programmers
> >>> who mix PHP into HTML just don't know how to program cleanly.
> >>> -DE-DE.
> >> for a newbie, who likes your style, please reference or explain
> >> the syntax:
> >>
> >> print <<<ENDOFHTML
> >>
> >> bill
> >
>
> That sure will make writing html with embedded PHP variables a
> LOT more straightforward !
>
> bill
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|