Posted by Jerry Stuckle on 12/20/06 02:43

Petr Vileta wrote:
> "Ivan Marsh" <annoyed@you.now> píse v diskusním príspevku
> news:pan.2006.12.19.16.44.19.595637@you.now...
>
>> On Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:38:10 +0100, Michael Fesser wrote:
>>
>>> .oO(Ivan Marsh)
>>>
>>>> The only thing to tell them is that processing .htm files as anything
>>>> other than HTML files is simply not right.
>>>
>>>
>>> Having .htm(l), .php and maybe even more extensions in the URLs on the
>>> same site is not right either.
>>
>>
>> What other purpose do file extensions serve other than to identify the
>> content of the file and how it should be processed?
>
> Htm/htmll should be used for static pages and php for dynamic but one
> reason exist for using html extension for dynamic page. Name of this
> reason is Google :-) Though it is strange the Google robots visit
> htm/html pages frequently then php. This is one of many SEO practices
> how to mystify Google and other lookup servers.

Not in my experience. I've seen Google visit both of them. IMHO it
more depends on the number of incoming links than the file extension.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

• Next in forum: Re: PHP exec() and Zipping Upload file in Windows
• Prev in forum: PHP exec() and Zipping Upload file in Windows
• Thread view: Re: htm vs. php problem

[Reply to this message]