|
|
Posted by Curtis on 01/04/07 11:06
On what operating system are you running? I have been very pleased with
Apache 2.0.xx on Win XP pro (although I would prefer to run it on win
2k). The downside is that certain libraries and features aren't ported
to win32 just yet. In a *nix environment, Apache is a very good choice.
I've only used FastCGI with ruby on rails, while I always use mod_php
for PHP. I couldn't provide a fair comparison. Have you googled around?
People have probably performed various tests on performance issues
related to yours.
On Jan 3, 11:45 am, Vincent Delporte <just...@acme.com> wrote:
> On 3 Jan 2007 11:32:19 -0800, "NC" <n...@iname.com> wrote:
>
> >Check the documentation for your HTTP server. It will likely have
> >some information about performance improvement with PHP.
> >Generally speaking, CGI is the worst performer. The choice
> >between FastCGI and server modules will depend on the HTTP
> >server you are using.I'm free to use any server that I want since it'll be hosted on our
> premises. Apart from loading the PHP interpreter at boot time, what
> else do FastCGI and Apache's mod_php do to increase performance? Do
> they compile PHP scripts into bytecode once, do they leave connections
> to MySQL open, other things?
>
> Thank you.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|