|
|
Posted by eholz1 on 01/06/07 18:21
Hello Andy,
Thanks for the info. I do have both netpbm and ImageMagik installed on
my "test" server, so that is ok.
I can convert images, and them move them to my production web site.
Thanks again,
ewholz
(how come all the image stuff seems to come from the UK???, I guess no
one uses it in the US :)
Andy Hassall wrote:
> On 6 Jan 2007 09:18:15 -0800, "eholz1" <ewholz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >In terms of making thumbnails, resizing images, etc are there any other
> >programs that work better
> >(whatever "better" means) than GD??? I have a version of gallery
> >(menalto opensource program) and it seems to like netpbm, ImageMagik,
> >etc. are either of these better or faster, etc. Or are they more or
> >less equal??? My goal is to check size of original image (typically
> >3000px by 3072 px) and make a thumbnail, and resize the "big" image to
> >appropriate browser size (a poor man's gallery program).
> >and when a viewer clicks the thumbnail, display the bigger image via
> >php in browser.
>
> ImageMagick is generally more suited to processing photographic images; GD is
> mostly for computer-generated "block" graphics. ImageMagick is also somewhat
> faster for image processing (resize etc.) and can give subjectively better
> results as there's many options for filters and convolutions.
>
> See also http://groups.google.co.uk/group/comp.lang.php/msg/a676e8f1a175b4ed
>
> The downside is that (a) it has to be installed in the first place and (b) you
> may need to shell out to the "convert" command, although there are a couple of
> PHP APIs that give you direct access to the ImageMagick API.
>
> --
> Andy Hassall :: andy@andyh.co.uk :: http://www.andyh.co.uk
> http://www.andyhsoftware.co.uk/space :: disk and FTP usage analysis tool
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|