|
|
Posted by al jones on 01/09/07 00:02
On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 23:15:46 GMT, mbstevens wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 09:52:27 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
>> But there is a simple solution, come to think of it, remove
>> height and put in a bottom margin for the img, I will update in a
>> minute...
>
> Cool! Works great here.
>
>>
>> Remember the magic of tables for all this? Before the time one
>> could be shot on site ... er... I mean, sight. <g>
>
> If each image should actually be associated with the text that comes
> after, I don't see why this could not be interpreted as tabular data. It
> all depends on the intent of the author.
The OP is engulfing a hamburger - but have read what you two put together
and will shortly go back and see if it makes sense when I try to implement
it.
Thanks guys!! //al
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|