|
|
Posted by SqlDope on 01/09/07 23:15
"Paul Lautman" <paul.lautman@btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:50htf7F1g3unvU1@mid.individual.net...
> SqlDope wrote:
>> "Paul Lautman" <paul.lautman@btinternet.com> wrote in message
>> news:50hhroF1frfrvU1@mid.individual.net...
>>> SqlDope wrote:
>>>> Hello, I wonder if anyone can help me
>>>> My Table
>>>> ID Sunames Inscription
>>>> typical entrys
>>>> ID 10
>>>> Surnames @ABBOTT@JONES@
>>>> rem the @ is there so that I can select a whole word and not get
>>>> ABBOT Inscription John ABBOTT died 10 june 1857 also his sister
>>>> mary JONES died 16 may 1868
>>>>
>>>> my query
>>>> if ($soundex==exact)
>>>> $query="Select * FROM paupers WHERE surnames LIKE '%@$name@%'"
>>>> else
>>>> $query="Select * FROM paupers WHERE soundex(surnames) LIKE
>>>> '%@(soundex($name))@%'"
>>>>
>>>> the first part -- LIKE '%@$name@%' works fine
>>>> but I can`t get the syntax for the soundex bit right
>>>> any help appreciated
>>>> Regards
>>>
>>> You should not put lots of surnames in a single record. Each surname
>>> should occupy its own single field in a single record.
>> Hi Paul,
>> I understand your point there but in this case I need to have up to 5
>> surnames in a string in surnames field, these are the surnames in that
>> particular inscription
>> other wise I would have to have 5 surname fields -- surname1 surname2
>> .... and then do a seperate select on each surname field
>> Regards
>
> Please do not top post!
>
> No you DO NOT need to have 5 surnames in a single field. And I did NOT say
> that you should have 5 surname fields. I very carefully said that you
> should have each surname in a SINGLE field in a SINGLE record. You can
> then tie 5 or as many of those records as you like together with a common
> foreign key.
>
> It is called database normalisation.
>
Hi Paul, I took your advise and all is working fine now.
Thank you again and regards
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|