|
Posted by dorayme on 01/10/07 06:19
In article <15jn3sei5rgh2$.pi9d8x4p9upj.dlg@40tude.net>,
al jones <alfredmjones@shotmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2007 11:21:29 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
> >
> > Trust us, it makes sense.
> No, it doesn't ....More at end.
>
> Okay, take a look at aljones.us/vad.htm which is based on your latest.
>
I get nothing at this address. I went to
http://aljones.us/630817vad.html instead. This right?
> For each image I will probably have three different h3 / p pairs (the date
> and associated text). If it were to do what I'm trying to achieve, Your
> line 'Meyer quote' and my line 'heading test' would both be to the right of
> the (supposedly) associated image With the releated text immediately below
> them.
>
> Enclosing the image within the p associates it, seemingly, with only that
> paragraph and the following two paragraphhs fall beneath the image.
>
> If I'm not missing the obvious .... I *am* getting a royal headache.
It is a bit hard to see quite the code I put up in yours, perhaps
I don't know your context well enough? But yours behaves much
better if you were to do things like:
div#moststuff {
border-left: solid thin blue;
color: black;
margin: 0em 0 5em 13em;
padding: .5em;
}
There is a margin, see, in which the nav float sits.
and
div#leftbit {
float: left;
margin: 0;
padding: 1ex;
width: 12em;
max-height: 30em;
overflow: auto;
border: solid thin blue;
}
I would forget the overflow fandangle and max height. But this em
based width behaves better with the nav set in ems and takes
account of font size adjustment by user.
With those changes, your site behaved. But I would simplify a lot
of things. Anyway, best of luck.
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|