| 
	
 | 
 Posted by ThePsyko on 01/12/07 22:22 
On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve cry 
out in news:4LTph.21$9M6.1@newsfe03.lga...  
 
>  
> "ThePsyko" <thepsyko@itookmyprozac.com> wrote in message  
> news:Xns98B683A55608LifeIsGood@nntp.petitmorte.net... 
>| On 12 Jan 2007 I stormed the castle called alt.2600 and heard Steve 
>| cry out in news:BoSph.34$US6.2@newsfe02.lga... 
>| 
>| > 
>| > "Bill K" <msuwkrull@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>| > news:1168617886.958531.250160@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... 
>| >| 
>| >| Steve wrote: 
>| >| > "Onideus Mad Hatter" <usenet@backwater-productions.net> wrote in 
>| >| > message news:6u8eq21l8mutmtghv9au6ctihi7jmftvd4@4ax.com... 
>| >| > | I've noticed over the past year that every time I run a search 
>| >| > | for something...I start rackin up blog hit after blog hit 
>| >| > | after blog hit. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > <snip> 
>| >| > 
>| >| > learn to google. better yet, go to the flash site and get TFM 
>| >| > !!! i  
>| > program 
>| >| > in several languages and have NEVER had the problem you're 
>| >| > describing. further, i have several technical hobbies as well. 
>| >| > each are well covered 
>| > in 
>| >| > blogs...in fact, and counter to your pompous-assed attitude and 
>| > assertions, 
>| >| > i look forward to getting a blog link as i can be reasonably 
>| >| > certain 
>| > that 
>| >| > someone has posted links to more informative non-blogged source 
>| >| > sites... 
>| >| > 
>| >| > arrogant son-of-a-bitch! you have a problem with blogs...fine. I 
>| >| > HATE DUMBASSES who see fit to post OFF-TOPIC diatribes in nntp 
>| >| > groups whos context is specific, and specifically NOT for such 
>| >| > tirades! 
>| >| > 
>| >| > now, on to your quotes... 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | Hatter Quotes 
>| >| > | ------------- 
>| >| > | "You're only one of the best if you're striving to become one 
>| >| > | of the best." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > illogically exclusive. certainly the most likely to achieve such 
>| >| > a title 
>| > of 
>| >| > being the best at a thing are NOT those who work particularly 
>| >| > had for 
>| > it. 
>| >| > rather, they are those with a natural disposition on inclination 
>| >| > toward 
>| > the 
>| >| > same. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "I didn't make reality, Sunshine, I just verbally bitch 
>| >| > | slapped you with it." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > your reality seems very distinct to you and not shared by the 
>| > majority...i 
>| >| > wonder who is more likely wrong. it is easy to see how the 
>| >| > conflict  
>| > between 
>| >| > our definition of reality and yours produces such friction as to 
>| >| > prompt 
>| > you 
>| >| > to hold the 'i'm ok, everyone else is not' attitude. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "I'm not a professional, I'm an artist." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > illogical equivocation. the quality of one's work gives no 
>| >| > indication as 
>| > to 
>| >| > whether or not one is actually employed to engage in such work. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Your Usenet blinders are my best friend." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > i thought your arrogance was. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Usenet Filters - Learn to shut yourself the fuck up!" 
>| >| > 
>| >| > yes...your post forces me to use my filter to 'shut yourself the 
>| >| > fuck 
>| > up' 
>| >| > since you cannot discipline your own tongue. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Drugs killed Jesus you know...oh wait, no, that was the Jews, 
>| >| > | my bad." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > oh you historian! the romans killed jesus, you fucking 
>| >| > anti-semite.  
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "There are clingy things in the grass...burrs 'n 
>| >| > | such...mmmm..."  
>| >| > 
>| >| > this is about the most coherent quote you've provided. too bad 
>| >| > it illuminates nothing. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "The more I learn the more I'm killing my idols." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > as is obvious the reason, their reality is vastly different from 
>| >| > the 
>| > world 
>| >| > in which you delude yourself. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Is it wrong to incur and then use the hate ridden, vengeful 
>| >| > | stupidity of complete strangers in random Usenet froups to 
>| >| > | further my art?" 
>| >| > 
>| >| > there is no wrong nor right. now as for polite or generally 
>| >| > acceptable 
>| > to 
>| >| > the masses, i think it is behavior that will earn your art to be 
>| >| > known 
>| > as 
>| >| > the art definitive of 'perfect ass'. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Freedom is only a concept, like race it's merely a social 
>| >| > | construct that doesn't really exist outside of your ability to 
>| >| > | convince others of its relevancy." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > and all things outside of the first-cause is likewise. which 
>| >| > means that 
>| > i 
>| >| > perceive i exist but cannot see any relevance in perceiving that 
>| >| > you do...and you give little cause that would 'convince others'. 
>| >| > after all, based on your blathering, narcisistic, and 
>| >| > hatefulness behaviour there 
>| > is 
>| >| > very little worth in us believing you do exist. that would be a 
>| >| > waste of time. consider the cost/benefit ratio. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Next time slow up a lil, then maybe you won't jump the gun 
>| >| > | and start creamin yer panties before it's time to pop the 
>| >| > | champagne proper." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > said your boyfriend on new years eve. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Reality is directly proportionate to how creative you are." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > only if you're delusional. reality is based on third-party 
>| >| > observations. even personal reality is kept in check...tried 
>| >| > levitating lately? 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "People are pretty fucking high on themselves if they think 
>| >| > | that they're just born with a soul. *snicker*...yeah, like 
>| >| > | they're just givin em out for free." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > kind of like intellect. while wholly devoid of such, you are 
>| >| > even more pitiful since you espouse that you do yet parade 
>| >| > around, completely 
>| > obvious 
>| >| > to all others, without a single marble in your bag. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Quible, quible said the Hare. Quite a lot of 
>| >| > | quibling...everywhere. So the Hare took a long stare and 
>| >| > | decided at best, to leave the rest, to their merry little 
>| >| > | mess."  
>| >| > 
>| >| > which is why i'm now plonking you. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "There's a difference between 'bad' and 'so earth shatteringly 
>| >| > | horrible it makes the angels scream in terror as they 
>| >| > | violently rip their heads off, their blood spraying into the 
>| >| > | faces of a thousand sweet innocent horrified children, who 
>| >| > | will forever have the terrible images burned into their tiny 
>| >| > | little minds'."  
>| >| > 
>| >| > other than considering your 'tiny little' mind, it would be good 
>| >| > to  
>| > start 
>| >| > with logic in supporting such a claim. first if you intend to 
>| >| > use angels 
>| > for 
>| >| > support, you should prove god exists and whether or not he 
>| >| > has/needs 
>| > angels. 
>| >| > further, you'd need to establish they have heads, need blood, 
>| >| > and have a fetish vented towards implanting unforgettable 
>| >| > imagery in ones head. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > there is a difference between 'earth shatteringly good' and 
>| >| > 'earth shatterlingly horrible'. all socially engaged animals 
>| >| > curtail partaking 
>| > of 
>| >| > the extremes of either as it may get them expelled from the 
>| >| > group -  
>| > spelling 
>| >| > a most certain doom. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "How sad that you're such a poor judge of style that you can't 
>| >| > | even properly gauge the artistic worth of your own efforts." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > that's a blanket quote you just throw out there to someone whom 
>| >| > you've 
>| > never 
>| >| > met? you don't know me or anyone else here. i'm sorry you find 
>| >| > it  
>| > necessary 
>| >| > to project. i do feel sad for you. however, i believe your 
>| >| > judging of 
>| > style 
>| >| > is merely an overestimation of yourself...you obviously 
>| >| > overvalue  
>| > everything 
>| >| > you do. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Those who record history are those who control history." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > illogical equivocation. you certainly do see everyone in a 
>| >| > negative  
>| > light. 
>| >| > this assertion assumes that motive records history and that the 
>| >| > events 
>| > of 
>| >| > history have little effect on the story. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "I am the living embodiment of hell itself in all its 
>| >| > | tormentive rage, endless suffering, unfathomable pain and 
>| >| > | unending horror...but you don't get sent to me...I come for 
>| >| > | you."  
>| >| > 
>| >| > narcisist. futher, prove hell. no matter the result of that 
>| >| > endeavor, 
>| > bring 
>| >| > it on. i'll spank your ass like a toddler. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Ideally in a fight I'd want a BGM-109A with a W80 250 kiloton 
>| >| > | tactical thermonuclear fusion based war head." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > ideally, i'd employ diplomacy so as to avoid conflict. here's my 
>| >| > quote: 'diplomacy - the art of letting others have your way'. 
>| >| > since you have no such art, or even tact, i can see why this 
>| >| > scenario has plagued your 
>| > mind 
>| >| > and why you'd consider it an ideal situation. 
>| >| > 
>|>| > | "Tell me, would you describe yourself more as a process or a 
>| >| > | function?" 
>| >| > 
>| >| > i can tell you that none of YOUR processes are functioning! 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Apparently this group has got the market cornered on stupid. 
>| >| > | Intelligence is down 137 points across the board and the 
>| >| > | forecast indicates an increase in Webtv users." 
>| >| > 
>| >| > you cross-posted. and as with the rest of your reality, every 
>| >| > one of 
>| > these 
>| >| > groups gets the corner if-and-only-if you come to 'participate' 
>| >| > in one 
>| > of 
>| >| > them. and your forecast is wrong. you are at 0 points...you 
>| >| > cannot get 
>| > any 
>| >| > more un-intelligent. what a moron...'down x points and due to 
>| > increase'...i 
>| >| > don't think you mean to be so optimistic. 
>| >| > 
>| >| > | "Is my .sig delimiter broken?  Really?  You're sure?  Awww, 
>| >| > | gee...that's too bad...for YOU!"    `, ) 
>| >| > 
>| >| > and here's my injunctive relief... 
>| >| > 
>| >| > *PLONK* 
>| >| > 
>| >| > now, FOAD. 
>| >| 
>| >| Hatter, you know you've arrived when you inspire so many people to 
>| >| spend so much time responding to you. Very few people have such 
>| >| power. Keep up the good work. Just think, if you got them to use 
>| >| their creative energy solving problems such as Iraq instead 
>| >| diatribes against you, imagine what could be accomplished. 
>| >| --  
>| >| A Hatter Fan 
>| > 
>| > bill is hatter. pretty sad when one rants, is confronted, and runs 
>| > and hides under a new identity. and, my response took all of about 
>| > 5 minutes. i had it to spare while my pc was compiling some code. 
>| > go spew your stupidity somewhere else. 
>| > 
>| > FOAD 
>| > 
>| > 
>| > 
>| 
>| lol... You're new to usenet aren't you... 
>| 
>| --  
>| ThePsyko 
>| Public Enemy #7 
>  
> the sock strikes again. 
 
Results 1 - 10 of about 42,600  for author:thepsyko  (0.41 seconds)  
 
That's one stinky sock! 
 
 
 you have heard of statistical significance, 
> haven't you?  
 
Yes, but apparently you haven't studied it 
 
 
> first, what are the odds that someone favors your vanity, 
> stupidity, and narcissism? 
 
Odd.. most people tell me I'm too modest..  
 
 
> second, that three of them would follow you 
> into one of these three news groups?  
 
"follow" you?  I've been here since 1998...  
 
and you call ME vain lol!!!! 
 
 
> third, that they would find your 
> post among a myriad of other posts not made by you? 
 
Yeah, that damn highlighting of new posts... gets me every time 
 
 
>  and four, that 
> they all have the same cantor, tone, daftness, and arrogance in the 
> voice of their posts as you?  
 
I posted a total of 7 words (assuming you count "lol" as a word).. you  
got all that from a mere 7 words? 
 
 
> i know you lack such critical thinking 
> skills or familiarity with mathematics in general, however don't 
> assume the rest of us are so gullible.  
 
Sure thing.. as long as you don't assume the rest of us are a paranoid or  
moronic as you. 
 
 
 
>  
> i expect, if you have any honesty in you, you should just respond to 
> this reply with the name 'sockMaster'.  
 
Why would I do that?  I can't sock worth shit - just ask anybody lol.. if  
you were 1/4 as smart as you would like to believe you are, you would  
have looked into things before you ran your mouth and proved to everybody  
just what a moron you are. 
 
But hey, welcome to usenet!  We could use more clowns like you - it makes  
the days pass that much quicker. 
 
--  
ThePsyko 
Public Enemy #7
 
  
Navigation:
[Reply to this message] 
 |