|
Posted by N. O. Body on 06/25/05 18:29
Output buffering doesn't seem to change anything. Of course I could
completely be using it wrong.
As far as it being a timeout.. I tested using a script that loops from 1 to
500000 and outputs the seconds elapsed on each go and it lasts well over 7
seconds.
Any other ideas?
"Geoff Berrow" <blthecat@ckdog.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fk4qb1lftcr2sabgjaknjsmbodakoru88t@4ax.com...
>I noticed that Message-ID:
> <7C5ve.11576$VK4.6110@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net> from N. O. Body
> contained the following:
>
>>That was the first thing I checked.
>>
>>I have set the time very high, and I have also run it where it echoed the
>>elapsed time during every loop. It tended to die around 7 seconds.
>>
>
> It sounds like a timeout but that seems very short. Have you tried
> output buffering?
>
> --
> Geoff Berrow 0110001001101100010000000110
> 001101101011011001000110111101100111001011
> 100110001101101111001011100111010101101011
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|