|
|
Posted by aa on 01/18/07 14:59
"Andy Dingley" <dingbat@codesmiths.com>
Client-side assembly of this pre-processed templating is a bad idea,
> whether (as David says) by JS, or by any other possible mehod. It's a
> one-off static publishing process, so do it that way. Merge the files
> when you publish them and have the server serve their simple static
> merged versions. This works better in terms of what matters, the
> content you send out to the client. Caching will be assisted, for one
> thing.
Client-side caching works when there are files external to a given HTML
If you include these files at publishing, client side cache does not help
downloading pages using the same, say footer.
Yet I have no concerns for this for I am not a graphic addict and my pages
usually are very small hand coded things (the site with Flashes discussed
recently was an exception because I inheireted the graphics and the audience
is special, not just every visitor). My concern is maintenance. If there is
no access to server-side scripts, then JS works fine for to change menu I
need to change and upload just one JS file no mater how many HTML pages use
this menu.
> > Client-side JS is of course a bad idea for anything that is essential
to the core functioning of a site or page.
> Given your other recent clueless post, you're not surprising me here. 8-(
You know what your problem is? You and the likes of you here imagined
yourselves to be running the show. You do not give advices. You issue
instruction. And instead of free exchange of opinions you are trying to
command. Anyone who does not fit into your model is, if you let me use your
own lexicon, "a clue-proof idiot" who should "remove both of your thumbs
from your arse and stop talking shit". You cannot impatially discuss
technicalities. You've got to make personal assaults
>
> > 1. The author is talking about navigation, header, footer do not need to
be
> > scanned by Search Engines.
> That is simply ridiculous. Of course navigation needs to be accessible
> to minimal non-JS spiders.
So if you do not accept the concept of different purposes of websites and
different target audiences, then I respect your opinion and memorise it.
No point to get hot.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|