|
|
Posted by aa on 01/18/07 15:22
"Toby Inkster" <usenet200701@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote in message
news:tgb484-iuj.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk...
> aa wrote:
>
> > I guess web-hosts without server side scripts are more probable then
> > visitors without JS
>
> But you have full control over the server, but very little control over
> the client. So if you choose a server with server-side scripting
> capabilities, then your "probability" of having a server without
> server-side scripting available is 0%, whereas the probability of having a
> visitor without client-side scripting is still 5-15%.
I like the way you use "if" :)
Henry Ford said that his customers can shoose a car of every color as long
as this color is black
Following your pattern I can coin the following:
IF every customer selects IE the probability of having a JS-less user is 0.
Or probably a bit higher for there are some cranks who bothered to learn how
to disable JS, graphics, cookies etc
Shall we ask visitors of this NG how many of them have full control over the
server hosting their websites?
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|