|
|
Posted by Michael Winter on 06/26/05 17:24
On 26/06/2005 12:17, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
[snip]
> I didn't mean to be critical, but I definitely wouldn't encourage structures
> like <h1><img src="foo"></h1>.
There's nothing wrong with that structurally. With the required alt
attribute, that is perfectly acceptable if the image does render the
level one heading for the document. If the image cannot be displayed,
then the alt attribute will convey whatever the image should have.
[snip]
> What I suggest you do is this:
>
> -Go to: http://www.csszengarden.com/
[...]
> -Note the way they combine header images and actual text in a very compliant
> and elegant way.
That isn't very good, in my opinion. If I've disabled images in my
browser for faster loading times (and I do from time to time), I would
lose all of the text rendered normally by images. To view that text, I
would have to disable the style sheet as well.
Mike
--
Michael Winter
Replace ".invalid" with ".uk" to reply by e-mail.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|