|
|
Posted by dorayme on 01/24/07 21:55
In article <b4mj84-bv9.ln1@ophelia.g5n.co.uk>,
Toby Inkster <usenet200701@tobyinkster.co.uk> wrote:
> dorayme wrote:
>
> > But who knows, is there a hint of a gap in the transmission? And about
> > telecommunications being in its infancy, how about comparing it to 19th
> > century efforts to balance things up?
>
> You can't compare it with 19th century telecommunications because there
> were no 19th century attempts to use telecommunications technologies in
> space.
In the 19th Century, we were very advanced in such things. But
let me only address puny earthling adventures: now you are
qualifying "telecommunications with "space". That is a way to win
the argument! But how fairly? Are human space communications so
very different to all other ether transmissions that the zero
point is somewhere in the 1990's?
Lets cut to the chase. I have absolutely incredibly sensitive and
big antennae (ears, to you, earthling) and I heard Armstrong
direct, never mind transmissions, shranmissions...
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|