|
|
Posted by dorayme on 01/25/07 01:23
In article <trRth.81471$Qa6.14493@newsfe6-gui.ntli.net>,
"The Eclectic Electric" <nospam@spamispoo.spam> wrote:
> "dorayme" <doraymeRidThis@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> >> Carrier Names:
> >> http://home.grandecom.net/~cvproj/gen-names.htm
> >
> > I would be inclined to make a page per letter. It is simply not a
> > page that many folk would read and scroll.
> >
> > Have not looked at other urls you mention, but this reasoning may
> > give you a clue about a different point of view on them too.
> >
>
> But for me, that adds more clicks to my viewing, whereas a large table means
> I can simply scroll up and down with my mouse. I guess it's a matter of
> taste.
When I said "Have not looked at other urls you mention, but this
reasoning may give you a clue about a different point of view on
them too" I meant reasoning about what the table consists of, is
it really one table with a set of closely related items or can it
be split up into more tables that have a significant integrity of
their own. Nothing is a matter of taste in my mood this morning.
<g>
--
dorayme
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|