|
|
Posted by Neredbojias on 01/31/07 09:45
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007 11:44:27 GMT Andy Dingley scribed:
> On 28 Jan, 22:32, Neredbojias <inva...@example.com> wrote:
>> > Frames cause problems. They _always_ cause these problems.
>
>> Not always. Take, for example, a single frame frame.
>
> This still decouples (a bad thing) the URL of the container (and
> address bar, and bookmarks) from the URL of the content page.
Verily, but I've made frames pages wherein the (sub) frames "pagelets"
where so "slaved" to the rest of the synchronized content that their urls
were meaningless, anyway. Iow, the only significant url was that of the
frameset. This, of course, implies an inability to directly bookmark a
certain phase or "flavour" of the set, but that can actually be desirable
in some cases.
--
Neredbojias
He who laughs last sounds like an idiot.
Navigation:
[Reply to this message]
|